Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Darren Rowe v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7384
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARREN M. ROWE
Sears v. Sears et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Carma Dennis McGee, Dr. Robert M. Wheatley, Elaine B. Beeler and others
Plaintiff:
Anne A. Sears
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ROWE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv13482
Plaintiff:
DALE M. ROWE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floreria Lee, Inc. v. Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Adam M. Rowe and Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Floreria Lee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowe v. Clarke
as 7:2018cv00383
Petitioner:
Darren M. Rowe
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowe v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00568
Defendant:
Ann Balogh, Trinidad Drozeski, Harry Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibson v. Vanjani et al
as 3:2017cv01705
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Gibson
Defendant:
Vanjani, M. Rowe and E. Tootell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAILE et al v. HOUGHSTEIN et al
as 4:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
J JAY SANDERS HAILE, VII and R JENKINS
Defendant:
J JONES, P J BONDI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Davis et al
as 5:2016cv05375
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Brooks
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, David, Vanjani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Downey et al
as 1:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sims
Defendant:
James A. Downey, Jr., Betsy H. Phillips, Sidney H. Kirstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
