Cases 21 - 30 of 2,646
STEVENS v. 3 SQUARES DINER, LLC
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEVENS, JESSICA MCCALL, BRIANA PALMER and others
Defendant:
3 SQUARES DINER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall, Jr. v. Benzie, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Mccall, Jr.
Defendant:
Benzie County, Joshua Rubin, Crystal Lake Township and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCall v. Unknown
as 1:2024mi00004
Plaintiff:
Bondaryl McCall
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
McCall v. The State
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Quinn McCall
Defendant:
The State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hernandez v. McCALL LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Claudia Hernandez
Defendant:
McCALL LOGISTICS, LLC and Torriana McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
