Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Deschepper et al v. Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08379
Plaintiff:
Demian C Deschepper , Harrison Pious , Michael Olson and others
Defendant:
Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc., Midwest Wine and Spirits, Inc. and David Gargano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02958
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Olson v. Abate et al
as 3:2013cv50036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Olson
Defendant:
James Abate, Daniel Riportella, Brandon Straw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. Ecorse Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv13057
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moore and Lenda J Campbell
Defendant:
Ecorse Police Department, Michael Olson, Andrew Thomas and others
Ohman v. Gearman et al
as 4:2012cv04076
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Ohman
Defendant:
Jason Gearman, Mandi Mowery, Michael Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthon v. Shinseki et al
as 2:2009cv00974
Plaintiff:
Robert Eric Anthon
Defendant:
Eric K Shinseki, Chris Norton and Michael Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solverdi Worldwide, Ltd., et al v. Olson, et al
as 2:2009cv01279
Plaintiff:
Solverdi Worldwide, Ltd., Solverdi Worldwide, Ltd., Solverdi, LLC and others
Defendant:
Michael Olson, Anastasia Olson, Olson Family Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Olson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv04467
Plaintiff:
Michael Olson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
