Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Pattison v. Tolotti, et al.
as 26-5600
Plaintiff:
DANTE PATTISON
Defendant:
TOLOTTI, CRYSTAL PADILLA, ELAIN and others
Zapantis?Dalamakis v. City of New York
as 26-2420
Plaintiff:
EMILY ZAPANTISDALAMAKIS, MICHAEL MONZILLO, ARIJANA LUKACEVIC and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Hill v. Naphcare, U.S., Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv02516
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T. McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALESA v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv01796
Plaintiff:
MEGAN RYAN CALESA
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ROSS v. GRANGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2026cv01791
Plaintiff:
MEGAN ROSS
Defendant:
GRANGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Green v. Amusement Midway Providers, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00375
Plaintiff:
Megan Green
Defendant:
Amusement Midway Providers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nielsen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00556
Plaintiff:
Megan Clair Nielsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ABC IP, LLC, et al., v. Shalo Tek, Inc., et al.
as 4:2026cv01123
Plaintiff:
ABC IP, LLC and Rare Breed Triggers Inc.
Defendant:
Shalo Tek, Inc., Travis Michael Brewer and Megan Ryan Brewer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Megan Lisota v. Heartland Dental, LLC, et al
as 26-2739
Plaintiff:
MEGAN LISOTA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HEARTLAND DENTAL, LLC and RINGCENTRAL, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
