Cases 21 - 30 of 443
Yolanda Irving v. The City of Raleigh
as 23-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOLANDA IRVING, individually and as the natural parent of J.I., JUWAN HARRINGTON, CYDNEEA HARRINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH, OMAR ABDULLAH, Officer, in their individual capacity, WILLIAM ROLFE, Sergeant, in their individual capacity and others
Moller v. USA
as 1:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Michael J. Moller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MOLLER v. TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COUNSEL et al
as 1:2023cv00921
Defendant:
TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COUNSEL, TEC, IAN CONNERS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MOLLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Defendant:
Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc., A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S and Maersk Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
MOLLER v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc et al
as 3:2023cv10803
Plaintiff:
VIOLA MOLLER
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Corwin v. Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Robert Corwin
Defendant:
Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc., Thomas Gad, Claus Juan Moller San Pedro and others
SCHALALBEO v. DAMCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
ANGELA SCHALALBEO
Cross Defendant:
DAMCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., THE MAERSK GROUP, MAERSK and others
Defendant:
MSC, MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO. USA, HERCULES CHASSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moller v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02009
Petitioner:
Michael J. Moller
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
