Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Beech v. Wilson et al
as 4:2019cv00457
Defendant:
Doctor Wilson, Mrs. Phillips, X-Ray Technician and others
Plaintiff:
David Beech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baylor v. Eto et al
as 0:2019cv00442
Defendant:
Hennepin County Child Support, Ms. Ayano Eto, Mr. Lee. R Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Sardarbekians v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Ms. Anna Safarian, Ms. Bridgette Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Sardarbekians
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. GDB CAPITAL GROUP et al
as 4:2019cv00049
Defendant:
barry ryan chapman, douglas john dehaan, gayle dehaan and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. PHILLIP TIMOTHY HOWARD and JENNIFER HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Boyd v. Helniski et al
as 5:2019ct03020
Defendant:
Mr. Strutz, Mr. Helniski, Mr. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Lamar Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neilson Fletcher v. USA, et al
as 17-17090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEILSON DAIN FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ESKER LEE TATUM, Jr. and others
Gold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv04378
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mr. Phillip Gold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vincent Mehdizadeh v. Phillip E. Koehnke et al
as 2:2017cv04368
Plaintiff:
Mr. Vincent Mehdizadeh
Defendant:
Mr. Phillip E. Koehnke and Phillip E. Koehnke, APC
Vega v. Invent Co: Administrator
as 17-6
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Vega
Defendant - Appellee:
Invent Co, Administrator, Invents Company, Adminsitrator, Invents CEO and others
DePalma v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2016cv01196
Plaintiff:
John DePalma
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Justice Center, Doctor Kori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
