Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Netsphere, Inc., et al v. Jeffrey Baron, et al
as 15-10341
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Movant - Appellant:
QUANTEC L.L.C. and NOVO POINT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL, GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL, L.L.P., DYKEMA GOSSETT, P.L.L.C. and others
Appellant:
RPV, LIMITED, AS TRUSTEE OF THE VILLAGE TRUST
Munsch v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04146
Plaintiff:
Sheila Munsch
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baron et al v. Vogel et al
as 3:2015cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Baron , Quantec LLC and Novopoint, LLC
Defendant:
Peter S Vogel , Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP , Daniel J Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Munsch v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
as 3:2014cv03687
Plaintiff:
Marie Munsch
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Munsch v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 2:2013cv05871
Plaintiff:
Laurin Munsch
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scott v. LaRosa et al
as 2:2012cv06415
Defendant:
William Boyd, Michael Cassidy, John Durkin and others
Plaintiff:
Tawana Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatchett v. Pennington County Jail et al
as 5:2012cv05094
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Hatchett
Defendant:
Pennington County Jail, Miller, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
