Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Huang v. Presbyterian Church (USA) et al
as 3:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeff Huang
Defendant:
Presbyterian Church (USA), University of Pikeville, Linda Dunatov and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hamilton v. Daley et al
as 1:2016cv09129
Plaintiff:
Darryl Hamilton , Sr.
Defendant:
Richard M Daley, Richard Devine, Phillip Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. USA
as 1:2016cv01625
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William R. Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01918
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Salary (ID 96349) v. Patton et al
as 5:2014cv03174
Plaintiff:
Mark T.J. Salary
Defendant:
R. Patton, (fnu) Bumguardner, Lorn R. Snedeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00782
Plaintiff:
Wesley R Patton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Fuller, et al v. Davis, et al
as 14-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FULLER, Grandparent and RUTH M. FULLER, Grandparent
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN W. DAVIS, Honorable Judge, in his official and individual capacity, MARY NOONAN, Honorable Judge, in her official and individual capacity, JAY JENSEN, Dr. of ACAFS, (a/k/a the Family Academy) and others
Patton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09489
Plaintiff:
Darlene R. Patton and Mitchell W. Patton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childress v. Skaggs et al
as 1:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Childress
Defendant:
Scott Skaggs, Jeff Scruggs, Phillip R. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller et al v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
David Fuller and Ruth M. Fuller
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis , Mary Noonan , Jay Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
