Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Myers v. Terrell et al
as 2:2014cv03545
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Terrelle Myers
Defendant:
Terry Terrell, Travis Skinner, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv02810
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams , James Anthony , Edward Backes and others
Defendant:
The United States of America and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mathes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27204
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mathes , Ramona Duby , Audrey Edwards and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. Social Security Duluth Office et al
as 0:2014cv04187
Defendant:
Social Security Duluth Office and Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Richard Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Mathes et al v. Ethicon,Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01668
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mathes , Ramona Duby , Audrey Edwards and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. Dooly et al
as 0:2014cv00746
Plaintiff:
David Richard Carlson
Defendant:
Becky Dooly, Susan Ginsburg, Fred Fredman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carlson et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00113
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ruth Carlson and Richard Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. The Nebraska Methodist Hospital et al
as 8:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Richard Carlson
Defendant:
Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. and The Nebraska Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
