Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Thomas v. QBE Insurance Corporation
as 5:2019cv00526
Defendant:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodney Thomas v. Ric Bradshaw, et al
as 19-11007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEAN, Correctional Health Service, in their official capacity, RIC L. BRADSHAW, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, in his official capacity, KRISTA SHUFFELL, RN, Correctional Health Services, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03043
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Rodney Thomas
as 18-13298
Petitioner:
In re: RODNEY THOMAS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Thomas v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2018cv80939
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Retz et al v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas Retz, Tammy Sue Retz and N.A.R.
Defendant:
State of Texas and DFPS Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBOIS v. SWEENEY et al
as 3:2018cv03718
Plaintiff:
RODNEY THOMAS DUBOIS
Defendant:
DONNA SWEENEY, SID OFFICERS UNKNOWN, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2018cv80079
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw, McInnis, Jean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.H. v. Maysville R-1 School District et al
as 5:2017cv06154
Plaintiff:
M.H.
Defendant:
Maysville R-1 School District , Robert Smith , Alan Hutchcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
