Cases 21 - 30 of 68
CUMMINGS v. POWELL et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. CUMMINGS
Defendant:
CATHY POWELL, CROSS POINT CHURCH OF GREENSBORO, CLINT S. MORSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Natchitoches Parish Probation & Parole
as 1:2015cv01417
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White
Defendant:
Probation & Parole Natchitoches Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Probation and Parole of Natchitoches Parish
as 3:2015cv00209
Defendant:
Probation and Parole of Natchitoches Parish
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Clark et al
as 5:2015cv00408
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Roach
Defendant:
Jennifer Clark, Mary Woodfork, Christopher Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lynn v. Crenshaw County Sheriff Department, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn
Defendant:
Crenshaw County Sheriff Department, Crenshaw County Jail, Ronnie White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. White et al
as 4:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
Linda G Martin
Defendant:
Ronnie White, D.J. Walker, Russell D Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan v. White et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Betty J Duncan
Defendant:
Ronnie White, D. J. Walker, Russell D. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. White et al
as 1:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Linda G Martin
Defendant:
Ronnie White, D.J. Walker, Russell D Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan v. White et al
as 4:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
Betty J Duncan
Defendant:
Ronnie White, D. J. Walker, Russell D. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
