Cases 21 - 30 of 2,052
Fluker v. Rollin' Wrench, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Steven Fluker
Defendant:
Rollin' Wrench, LLC and Reginald Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walls et al v. Sanders et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ruthie Walls, Jennifer Reynolds, Chandra Williams Davis and others
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Jacob Oliva, Sarah Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Konecny v. State of Texas, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS and others
ROLLINS v. OTTMAN
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
JULIE OTTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLINS v. MONTGOMERY
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA BOLLINS and LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
STEPHEN MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stanford v. England Carrier Services LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jason Stanford doing business as Motor Carrier #1476454 Rollin' Smoke at the Attache
Defendant:
England Carrier Services LLC, England Logistics LLC, CR England Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stanford v. England Carrier Services LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Jason Stanford doing business as Motor Carrier #1476454 Rollin' Smoke at the Attache
Defendant:
England Carrier Services LLC, England Logistics LLC, CR England Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
