Cases 21 - 30 of 31
TALBOTT v. ORTH et al
as 4:2014cv00014
Defendant:
MARY ANDERSON, KARA BARKER, ANNE CONATSER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DALE TALBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cappelletti v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2012mc00009
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cappelletti
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, S. Patton and M. Butcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cappelletti v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cappelletti
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, S. Patton and M. Butcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood et al v. Patton et al
as 2:2011cv02418
Plaintiff:
Warren Haywood, III and Jovita Davis
Defendant:
Carlton S Patton, Lisa P. Jackson and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Patton v. Mobile Medic, et al
as 09-60044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET S PATTON, individually and as legal representative of the heirs-at-law of Oris Red Patton, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MOBILE MEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE INC, doing business as American Medical Response Inc and JOHN DOES 1-20
Patton v. Astrue
as 6:2008cv03273
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Patton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Miles v. Leslie, et al
as 1:2008cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gregory Miles
Defendant:
R Leslie, S Patton and H. Tate
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patton v. Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00653
Plaintiff:
Margaret S. Patton
Defendant:
Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc., Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc., John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Medical Malpractice
USA v. Patton et al
as 3:2007cv01261
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
James S Patton, Jerry M Patton, Amy D Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Patton v. Quarterman
as 1:2007cv00285
Petitioner:
Phillip S. Patton
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
