Cases 21 - 30 of 140
Swaney v. North Light Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02909
Plaintiff:
Ross Swaney
Defendant:
North Light Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE CORDELL HIGGINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTIN v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
HASSAN MARTIN
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, WARDEN JOHN LANKEY, SGT. ANTHONY DRAGONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Swaney v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Tamara Swaney
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Minotta Cuero v. Swaney et al
as 6:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Jose Wilber Minotta Cuero
Respondent:
Swaney and Director of BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Tyrone Price
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lenze v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Andrew Myles Lenze
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Royster v. Swaney et al
as 8:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Royster
Defendant:
Tennille L. Swaney, Florida Department of Revenue, Julie L. Sercus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Omar S Williams
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Swaney
as 7:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Noe Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
