Cases 21 - 30 of 2,684
United States of America v. Smith
as 24-2294
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TRENT SCENTAIL SMITH
Chavis v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Lea Holbrook, Dr. Happy Smith, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weiss v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Allen
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Derek A. Hill
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trent v. Duplin County Jail et al
as 5:2024ct03074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Trent and Kendra Belle Trent
Defendant:
Duplin County Jail, Captain Hanchey and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Jessee et al
as 7:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Leah Jessee, Kevin Fox, J. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duenas
as 1:2024at00232
Petitioner:
Gustavo Adolfo Duenas
Defendant:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hubacek et al v. ON Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Philip R Hubacek, Jeffrey S Lew, Jessica Berliner and others
Defendant:
ON Semiconductor Corporation, Hassane El-Khoury, Thad Trent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
