Cases 21 - 30 of 50
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv00185
Defendant:
Ms. J. CRAMER, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dodd v. Nacogdoches County Sheriff Department et al
as 9:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Roger L Dodd
Defendant:
Nacogdoches County Sheriff Department, Jason Bridges, Kenneth King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polly v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2016cv00358
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department , Elliot Lyle and others
Plaintiff:
Lillian M Polly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Morris et al
as 4:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Norris Morris, Steven Pickett, Clarnce Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Wexford Health et al
as 3:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Roland Abangan, Ray Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Gus Harrison Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Unknown Smith, Unknown McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Gus Harrison Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Health Service, Unknown Sharon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon Russell v. Fred Lockwood, et al
as 13-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON L. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED LOCKWOOD, Deputy Warden, UNKNOWN COX, C/O, TINA STEPP, Grievance Coordinator and others
Russell #410544 v. Lockwood et al
as 1:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ramon L. Russell #410544
Defendant:
Fred Lockwood, Tina Stepp, Unknown Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
