Cases 21 - 30 of 49,509
Jonathan WalkerIn re: Jonathan Walker
as 24-1423
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN E. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv06125
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EARL WALKER
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04041
Plaintiff:
Kirklon Jacoby Walker
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shanreckia Lanell Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Sheriff Clint McRae, Sheriff Keith Dehart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Norfolk Southern Railway
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Andrew Walker
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tyson v. Walker et al
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tyson
Defendant:
Julian Walker and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Walker v. The City of New York
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER and Awol
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
