Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,909
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department et al
as 5:2024ct03068
Plaintiff: Michael Rankins
Defendant: Windsor Police Department, City of Windsor, Bertie County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department
as 5:2024ct03029
Plaintiff: Michael Rankins
Defendant: Windsor Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughart v. Rankins
as 24-7004
Petitioner: DONALD L. HUGHART
Respondent: WILLIAM RANKINS
Laster et al v. Rankin County School District
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff: Phillip Laster, Sr. and Ashanta Laster
Defendant: Rankin County School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIRKLAND v. DISALVO et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: TAVON THOMAS KIRKLAND
Defendant: MR. DISALVO, MR. SCHERER, MR. CAVALIERE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff: Jerrahmiah Rankin and Jerrahmiah J. Rankins
Defendant: Shelby County Jail, Chief Fields and Chief Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Harris Teeter, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09280
Plaintiff: Stacy Rankin
Defendant: Harris Teeter, LLC, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zetar v. Rankin et al
as 1:2023cv17104
Plaintiff: Jehad Zetar
Defendant: P.O. Rankin and Matteson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Small v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv01127
Petitioner: Vincent Harry Small
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?