Cases 31 - 40 of 12,072
Barnes v. Right
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Civil Right
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Barnes v. Guild Mortgage Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01792
Plaintiff:
Nikita Lynette Barnes
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Company LLC and McCalla, Raymer Liebert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Jeffery Weisman, et al v. Barnes Jewish Hospital, et al
as 24-1864
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Weisman and Strategic Biomedical, Inc.
Defendant:
Barnes Jewish Hospital, BJC Healthcare, Washington University, also known as Washington University School of Medicine and others
Collins v. Barnes et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Collins
Defendant:
FNU Barnes, FNU Isenhour and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Cascade Funding Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Vega v. Amurcon Realty Company et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frank Vega
Defendant:
Amurcon Realty Company, Micheal Barnes, Rebecca Cannady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
LC Optimist, LLC v. Barnes
as 1:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
LC Optimist, LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Daniel Barnes, IIIIn re: Daniel Barnes, III
as 24-3329
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL L. BARNES, III
Respondent:
ANTHONY DAVIS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
