Cases 31 - 40 of 26,511
United States of America v. SLSCO, LP
as 24-1460
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCSHERRY and LISA PALMA MCSHERRY
Defendant:
SLSCO, LP, DBA Slsco, Ltd., DBA Sullivan Land services, Ltd., BAUMGARDNER HOUSE RAISING, LLC, DBA Baumgartner House Lifting, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and others
RUSSELL v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
TODD A. RUSSELL
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and KHRISTINA PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGurn v. Palomar College et al
as 3:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Todd McGurn and Todd Edward McGurn
Defendant:
Palomar College and Local C.C.E. Unioun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BNSF Railway Company v. Beaulieu et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Pierson Beaulieu, Dustin Boyd, Wendy Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
(HC) Sipes v. Corcoran California State Prison
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Sipes
Respondent:
Corcoran California State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeude v. Ste. Genevieve County Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County Memorial Hospital and Dr. Teena Sharrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Balciunas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02927
Plaintiff:
Todd Balciunas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jara et al (PS) v. Lordell et al
as 1:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Todd Jara and Linda Jara
Defendant:
Sam Lordell, Sam Fief, Jiame Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
