Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Cooper v. Dahm et al
as 4:2015cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jean Ste. Paule Cooper, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheryl Dahm, Sean Crawford, Gail Huckins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samson et al v. Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast
as 2:2013cv03381
Plaintiff:
David Samson and Elisha Ann Fisher Samson
Defendant:
Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Fisher v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv05467
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Fisher
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fisher v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv02307
Petitioner:
Kathy Ann Fisher
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Adams v. Charles Easley, et al
as 12-16537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE L. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. EASLEY, ANDREW J. PAULSON, CGLS, INC., AKA Lee Road Investors and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tyrone Adams v. Charles Easley, et al
as 12-16004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE L. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. EASLEY, ANDREW J. PAULSON, CGLS, INC., AKA Lee Road Investors and others
Serafine v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Lucas M Serafine
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Matthew Cate , CDR Division of Adult Parole Operations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Adams v. Charles Easley, et al
as 11-17619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE L. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. EASLEY, ANDREW J. PAULSON, CGLS, INC., AKA Lee Road Investors and others
Azeem v. Fisher
as 2:2011cv01091
Plaintiff:
Mikaeel Y Azeem
Defendant:
Margaret Ann Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
