Cases 31 - 40 of 364
PHAM v. BELL et al
as 2:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
TUAN PHAM
Defendant:
GREGORY S BELL, JR, GREENWAY COMFORT SOLUTIONS, LLC doing business as GREEN WAY COMFORT SOLUTIONS HEATING & COOLING and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant:
Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bell, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Larry B. Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BELL v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD BELL, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell Jr v. Hewitt
as 6:2023cv03020
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell Jr
Defendant:
Richard Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2023cv03008
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Robert L Bell, Jr
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Osceola County Corrections
as 6:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curo Health Services LLC v. Bell
as 5:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Curo Health Services LLC doing business as Kindred at Home and Curo Health Services, LLC doing business as Kindred at Home
Defendant:
Edison DeWayne Bell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
BELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20343
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LESTER BELL, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
