Cases 31 - 40 of 1,063
Braxton v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02725
Plaintiff:
Brooke Lynne Nicole Braxton
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crisp v. E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04039
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON CRISP
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Andrews v. P.M.I. Southern States et al
as 7:2023cv06289
Plaintiff:
Braxton D Andrews
Defendant:
P.M.I. Southern States, Judge James D Willingham, III and Amy W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COOPER v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON RANDALL COOPER
Defendant:
DEPUTY OLIVER, MAJOR P. THOMPSON, SGT. HURL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Braxton v. Namaste Laboratories, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv16433
Plaintiff:
Helen Braxton
Defendant:
Namaste Laboratories, LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC, and Godrej SON Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOPER v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2023cv04696
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON RANDALL COOPER
Defendant:
OLIVER, P. THOMPSON, SGT. HURL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Braxton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Marvin Keith Braxton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Braxton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01074
Petitioner:
Tremain Lamar Braxton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
