Cases 31 - 40 of 2,551
Doughty v. Bright Energy Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Thomas Doughty
Defendant:
Bright Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bright v. Gandy et al
as 1:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bright
Defendant:
Dominique Gandy, Douglas Schofield, Maura McMahon Zeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Bright v. Wood
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Rickey Bright
Respondent:
Chris Wood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Reeves v. Circuit Court for Prince George's County
as 24-1104
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REEVES
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY, CIRCUIT COURT LAND RECORDS, ROBIN GILL BRIGHT, Lawyer and others
Bright v. Walgreen Co
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bright
Defendant:
Walgreens Co and Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Harry et al v. Wedbush Securities Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Bright Harry and Ronald S. Draper
Defendant:
Wedbush Securities Inc., KCG Americas LLC, ION Trading, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0041 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
