Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Clare Michelfelder v. Diane McGee, et al
as 14-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARE G. MICHELFELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE C. MCGEE, JOEL STEINMAN, GRIMM, BIEHN AND THACTHER, ATTORNES AT LAW, ERWIN D. MICHELFELDER and others
MICHELFELDER v. FERRIS et al
as 2:2013cv07261
Plaintiff:
CLARE MICHELFELDER
Defendant:
KENNETH FERRIS, DIANE C. MCGEE, JOEL STEINMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Idaho County Board of Commissioners et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2013cv00436
Plaintiff:
Idaho County Board of Commissioners , Idaho County , Open Roads 4 Idaho Ltd. and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Rick Brazell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Bernard McGee v. Warden Gulf CI, et al
as 13-12413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD C. MCGEE
Defendant - Appellee:
GULF CI WARDEN and BUSH, Sargent Gulf CI
MCGEE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv00867
Petitioner:
VERNON C. MCGEE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv03296
Plaintiff:
Rhonda C McGee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McGee v. Coleman et al
as 3:2012cv01581
Petitioner:
Vincent C McGee
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. Norman
as 4:2011cv02212
Petitioner:
Thomas C. McGee
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. Coleman
as 3:2011cv02296
Petitioner:
Vincent C McGee
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swilley v. Gwinnett County School District et al
as 1:2011cv04235
Plaintiff:
Patricia Swilley
Defendant:
Gwinnett County School District, Alvin J. Wilbanks, Jorge Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
