Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Black v. Pixley
as 1:2013cv00651
Petitioner:
Charles Black, Jr.
Respondent:
W. Pixley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Reynaldo M Bravo et al
as 2:2012cv10375
Defendant:
Charles Black, Reynaldo M Bravo, Sharon Pascual Bravo and others
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Black v. City of St. Marys, Ohio et al
as 3:2011cv01260
Plaintiff:
Charles Black
Defendant:
City of St. Marys, Ohio, Gregory Foxhoven and Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60360
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLACK and WILLIE MAE BLACK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACK et al v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60442
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLACK and MARY LEE BLACK
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION , KEENE CORPORATION , NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rust et al v. Gunter et al
as 4:1984cv00712
Defendant:
Charles Black, Terence B. Campbell, Harold W. Clarke and others
Interested Party:
Jorge A. Galindo and Eric F. Vela
Plaintiff:
Steven Harper, Peter Hochstein, Charles J. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Charles Black
as 09-50631
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES ELLIS BLACK, AKA Charles Black
USA v. Jacob Black
as 09-30704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JACOB CHARLES BLACK, also known as Jacob Carter
Black v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al
as 2:2008cv01454
Plaintiff:
Luana Black and Charles Black
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
