Cases 31 - 40 of 51
OPIPARI v. CITY OF PRINCETON et al
as 1:2016cv03189
Defendant:
CITY OF PRINCETON, CORRECTION OFFICERS NOT YET IDENTIFIED, JOHN DYER and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN OPIPARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glen Hurlston v. City of Princeton, TX, et al
as 16-40399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOCTOR GLEN W. HURLSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PRINCETON, TEXAS, JEFFERY BARNETT, ROBERT MITCHNIK and others
Belcher v. City of Princeton Police Department, et al.
as 1:2015cv02525
Plaintiff:
Steven Ronald Belcher
Defendant:
City of Princeton Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diane Catherine Gavin v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-3404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diane Catherine Gavin
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington and others
Tucker v. Heaton et al
as 5:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Abigail A. Tucker
Defendant:
Rodney Heaton , Bobby Lewis , Brock Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Mattingly et al
as 1:2014cv01271
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert M Mattingly, Jamie Wypasek and City of Princeton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv14200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference
Brooke Bass v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-1756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brooke Nicole Bass
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, Benton County, Blue Earth County and others
Gavin v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00615
Defendant:
Anoka County, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Catherine Gavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurlston V. City of Princeton, Texas, et al
as 4:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Glen W. Hurlston
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Jeffery Barnett, Robert Mitchnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
