Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 200
Kane v. Colis et al
as 1:2021cv01937
Plaintiff: Patrick D. Kane
Defendant: Colis, Carr, Glowdek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKHART v. HALL et al
as 1:2021cv01798
Defendant: BRIDGEWAY, HALL, TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff: BILLY ANDREW BURKHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandross v. Williams et al.
as 8:2021cv01490
Plaintiff: Charles Nemon Vandross
Defendant: Perry Correctional Institution, Warden Charles Williams, Deputy Warden John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00372
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CONWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17218
Plaintiff: DAVID R CONWELL
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maritz Holdings Inc. et al v. Carter et al
as 4:2021cv00438
Defendant: Chris Dornfeld, Ben Valenti, Jesse Wolfersberger and others
Plaintiff: Maritz Holdings Inc. and Maritz Motivation Inc.
CONWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14695
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: BRIAN CONWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NISSLEY et al v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00880
Defendant: C. HARPER, A. NEAL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff: KELLY NISSLEY and STEVEN NISSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01864
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brooks et al v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2021cv00387
Defendant: Shontel Brown, Board of Commissions Cuyahoga County, Metro Health Medical Center and others
Plaintiff: Shone Trawick, Jr., Dalonte Brooks-Trawick, Dionne Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?