Cases 31 - 40 of 1,585
Gethsemani Baptist Church v. San Luis, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gethsemani Baptist Church
Defendant:
San Luis, City of, Nieves G Riedel, Jenny Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordova v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 0:2024cv60366
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Cordova
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kelsey Campbell v. Michelle Cordova
as 24-3175
Plaintiff:
KELSEY E. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHELLE L. CORDOVA
King v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
David Michael King
Defendant:
17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Steven Daugherty and Casey Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Echavarria-Cordova v. Garland
as 24-1035
Petitioner:
RIGOBERTO ECHAVARRIA-CORDOVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eutihia Joy Maria Mega v. Grand Bell, LLC, et al.
as 2:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Eutihia Joy Maria Mega and Los Angeles County Superior Court
Defendant:
Grand Bell, LLC, Thomas Martin Cordova, Steven Jones Meng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lozada-Guzman v. Goldman, Antonetti & Cordova, LLC
as 3:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Myrna Lozada-Guzman
Defendant:
Goldman, Antonetti & Cordova, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Callaway (PS) v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jessie Callaway
Defendant:
Gary Eugene Miller, Raymond Lee Johnson, Christopher M Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cordova v. Carr et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Anthony V Cordova
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Sarah Cooper, Randall Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
