Cases 31 - 40 of 4,318
Dawson v. Warden Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Ronald Dawson
Respondent:
Warden Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Dawson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lexis v. Dawson et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lexis
Defendant:
Dawson and Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terence Dawson v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Terence Dawson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CAVIC v. MAVEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
DANNY CAVIC
Defendant:
MAVEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, KAVITA DAWSON and ROBINSON MFG, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Dawson v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Javon Dawson
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abbey v. Aldag et al
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kyle Abbey
Defendant:
Edward, Jr. K. Aldag, J. Kevin Hanna, R. Steven Hamner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Dawson (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv00573
Petitioner:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galindo v. Dawson County et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ray Galindo
Defendant:
Dawson County and FNU Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
