Cases 31 - 40 of 46
United States v. Shaw
as 12-1501
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL SHAW
LNHA Liability Trust v. British Amerian Insurance Group, Ltd et al
as 2:2012cv02472
Plaintiff:
LNHA Liability Trust
Defendant:
British-American Insurance Group, Ltd., Peter A.T. Myrtle, Gabriel Cassagne and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards
Shaw v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2012dp21004
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy, Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shaw v. DePuy International Limited et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-21004
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Daniel Shaw v. MetroBank National Association
as 4:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
MetroBank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Law Student Appearances
as 3:2011mc09006
In Re:
Scott Barbur, Brendon Byard, Benjamin Cecil and others
Shaw v Citizens State Bank
as 4:2010cv00691
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
Citizens State Bank
Counter_claimant:
Citizens State Bank
Counter_defendant:
Daniel Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Holloway v. Shaw et al
as 1:2010cv02344
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Holloway
Defendant:
Daniel Shaw, Stewart Graybill and The Borough of Red Lion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. First Security Bank, National Association
as 3:2010cv01419
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
First Security Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. County of Wilson et al
as 5:2010ct03118
Plaintiff:
Isaac Lee Woods
Defendant:
County of Wilson, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, Wayne Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
