Cases 31 - 40 of 77
JAMES v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2013cv06584
Plaintiff:
SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTONIN SCALIA, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emma Du Bois v. Brenda Bradley, et al
as 13-20451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMA E. DU BOIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA DUBOIS BRADLEY, GAIL CARR, VICKI CERNA-BELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv08953
Plaintiff:
Gail Johnson and Don Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEAMING v. SUTER et al
as 1:2013cv00481
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant:
K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and JACK FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonzo Justice v. William Suter, et al
as 13-5068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alonzo N. Justice
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk of Court for United States Supreme Court and Gail Johnson, Clerk for the United States Supreme Court
Du Bois v. Bradley et al
as 4:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Emma E Du Bois
Defendant:
Brenda Dubois Bradley, Gail Carr, Vicki Cerna-Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Gail Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alonzo Justice v. William Suter, et al
as 12-5279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alonzo N. Justice
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk of Court for United States Supreme Court and Gail Johnson, Clerk for the United States Supreme Court
JUSTICE v. SUTER et al
as 1:2012cv00557
Plaintiff:
ALONZO N. JUSTICE
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER and GAIL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
