Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Adams v. Cabe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00093
Plaintiff: Gary Adams
Defendant: Lorenzo Cabe and Gloria Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS et al v. MEYERS et al
as 2:2011cv07464
Plaintiff: GARY ADAMS and DEANNA HARRIS
Defendant: RAYMOND C. MEYERS and ANGELA MORAIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00434
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Howard v. Phillips et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00103
Defendant: Gary Adams, E. Booher, S. Brown and others
Plaintiff: Robert Pharoah Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyer v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00053
Plaintiff: Sebonaire Boyer
Defendant: William Gary Adams, Thelma Jackson and Henry Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
The Standard Insurance Company v. Adams et al
as 8:2010cv00687
Plaintiff: The Standard Insurance Company
Defendant: Gary Adams and Adams Group Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Miller v. Tennis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00051
Petitioner: Gary Adam Miller
Respondent: Franklyn J. Tennis and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Gary Adam
as 09-10229
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GARY ADAMS
Malott et al v. Adams
as 1:2009cv00300
Plaintiff: Michael Malott and Z. M.
Defendant: Gary Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Potter et al
as 1:2008cv00526
Plaintiff: Gary Adams
Defendant: John Potter, John Potter, Michael Vance and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?