Cases 31 - 40 of 11,755
William Graham v. United States
as 24-2131
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
Bjorklund et al v. Ankeny Community School District et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jill Bjorklund, Mollie Jo Blahunka and Hurley Joseph Patrick, II
Defendant:
Ankeny Community School District and Jodie Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh and Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Addison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv14166
Plaintiff:
Graham Christopher Addison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Washington v. State of Texas
as 24-40205
Plaintiff:
Jacque Kenshashwa Washington
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Freeport, Texas, Brazoria County Court at Law No. 4 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
