Cases 31 - 40 of 725
Groome et al v. Chubb European Group SE et al
as 2:2023cv05057
Plaintiff:
David Groome, Sanda B. Groome and Sanda Groome
Defendant:
Chubb European Group SE, Minuteman Adjusters, Inc. and Shannon Malbrough
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Grooms v. Ballard County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Brandy Grooms
Defendant:
Ballard County Detention Center, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Steven Parmley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
JONES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALVIN JONES
Defendant:
MALINDA THOMAS, MS. GROOMS, MICHAEL L. SCARBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stone v. Georgetown County et al
as 2:2023cv03138
Counter Defendant:
William Allen Stone
Defendant:
Georgetown County, Georgetown County Sheriff, David Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grooms v. Bartlett et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Gregory Howard and Gregory Howard Grooms
Defendant:
J Bartlett, A Rutledge and Beaumont TX Medical Staff ECT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GROOM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16126
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER GROOM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
