Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Gilmore v. City of Bryan, TX
as 4:2014cv01866
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Bryan, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2014cv00289
Defendant:
Martin Allen, Samantha Angelle, Ben Benjamin and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jerome Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2013cv03149
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Gilmore
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gilmore et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-11700
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Gilmore and Neil W. Gilmore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Gilmore et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11700
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Gilmore and Neil W. Gilmore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. First American Title Insurance Co et al
as 1:2013cv10154
Plaintiff:
James Hart
Defendant:
First American Title Insurance Co, Parker S. Kennedy, Dennis J. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Anderson et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2012cv01815
Plaintiff:
Virgil S. Anderson , Willie E. Anderson , Beulah Baham and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffrey Olney v. John Hartwig, et al
as 11-35180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY W. OLNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HARTWIG, Department of Corrections Doctor, Snake River Correctional Instituition, J. GILMORE, T. HICKS and others
Pope v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00632
Defendant:
John Doe, J. Gilmore, A. Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
