Cases 31 - 40 of 2,015
In re: James Moss
as 24-10185
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD MOSS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
White v. Michigan, State of
as 1:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
James Edward White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
USA v. James Bess, III
as 23-14215
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARDS BESS, III
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer C. Via, Correctional Officer P. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Workman v. LHC Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Edward Workman
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Edwards v. Garcia et al
as 5:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Mark James Edwards
Defendant:
Marty Garcia, Keane Thummel Trucking I N C, National Interstate Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rochard et al v. One World Messenger et al
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ralph Peter John Henry Rochard and Con Smith
Defendant:
One World Messenger LLC, TEK Resources LLC, James Edward Bame and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WHALEY v. CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD WHALEY
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA, BRENTTEN ROBERT LAETHEM and JENNA LAETHEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Gibson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
James Gibson, II and James Edward Gibson, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
