Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Martens et al v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2018cv01963
Plaintiff:
Thelma Martens and George Martens
Defendant:
Ohio Attorney General, Jodi Mathias, City of Findlay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harrington et al v. City of Hastings et al
as 4:2015cv03152
Defendant:
John Adams, All Other Employees of the City of Hastings, Josh Armon and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Harrington, Meltech, Inc. and Midwest Girls Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Harrington et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06798
Plaintiff:
Ellen Harrington and John Harrington
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wynn et al v. Perry et al
as 3:2014cv00625
Plaintiff:
Stacey Wynn , Orlando Harshaw , Sean L. Smith and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Mitchell, Lawrence Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Zwick v. Inteliquent, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05044
Plaintiff:
David Zwick
Defendant:
Inteliquent, Inc., Richard Monto and John Harrington
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mayard v. Tallarico et al
as 0:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
Elsie M. Mayard
Defendant:
Anthony Tallarico, Carlos Wong, Daniel Freiermuth and others
Justin Sallis v. Catherine Pavlak, et al
as 10-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Justin F. Sallis
Defendant - Appellee:
Catherine Pavlak, John Harrington and City of St. Paul
Defendant:
Does 1-6
MA Equipment Leasing I LLC et al v. Tilton et al
as 1:2010cv00701
Plaintiff:
MA Equipment Leasing I LLC and MA 265 North Hamilton Road LLC
Defendant:
Lynn Tilton, Patriarch Partners LLC, Patriarch Partners Management Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
