Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Singh et al v. Wells et al
as 1:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
Iqbal Singh and IMS, P.C.
Defendant:
Russell G. Wells, James Sherman, John Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sherman v. General Electric Company
as 1:2008gd50365
Plaintiff:
William Sherman, William Sherman, James Sherman and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company, General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darryl Baker v. USA, et al
as 08-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL ORRIN BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVT OFFICIALS, ELLEN MCNINCHS, MERRILLO and others
Not Party - Amicus Curiae:
COURT APPOINTED AMICUS CURIAE
Darryl Baker v. USA, et al
as 08-2288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL ORRIN BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVT OFFICIALS, at F.C.I. MCKEAN, ELLEN MCNINCHS, at F.C.I. MCKEAN, MERRILLO, at F.C.I. MCKEAN and others
Not Party - Amicus Curiae:
COURT APPOINTED AMICUS CURIAE
Maida et al v. Sherman et al
as 4:2007cv01151
Plaintiff:
Dominick Maida, Dorothy Marie Maida and Maida Inc
Defendant:
Samantha Sherman, Joe Vincent, II, James Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sherman v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2007cv02362
Plaintiff:
James Sherman
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 04-2414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Turkmen et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2002cv02307
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ahmer Abbasi, Anser Mehmood, Benamar Benatta and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Robert Mueller, James W. Ziglar and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
