Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Golloway v. The Board of Trustees of Auburn University et al (MAG2)
as 3:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Sunny W. Golloway
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of Auburn University , Jay Jacobs , David Benedict and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CHILDS v. LAMAR COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
JASON CARTER CHILDS
Defendant:
LAMAR COUNTY GEORGIA, LAMAR COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, JEREMY ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00050
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JEREMY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTS v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00051
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JEREMY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Jeremy Stevenson
as 12-3960
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremy Robert Stevenson
ROBERTS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2012cv30011
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ROBERTS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Thompson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv12493
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Robert Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Jenkins-Bey v. Alvarado et al
as 5:2011ct03062
Plaintiff:
David C. Jenkins-Bey
Defendant:
Rodolfo Alvarado, Jeremy Roberts, Raymond Eure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christensen v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2010cv00896
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Robert Christensen
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mathew Cates, James D Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christensen v. State of California et al
as 2:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Robert Christensen
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and Mathew Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
