Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12210
Plaintiff:
Rashad Akeem Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Dan Lachance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12094
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Patricia Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FONTROY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
DAVID S OWENS, JOHN DOE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Tormu E. Prall, et al
as 12-3947
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Grand Rapids, City of v. Moes
as 1:2012cv01092
Plaintiff:
Robert John Moes
Defendant:
Grand Rapids, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Barclay v. New York
as 12-1593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. Patrick Barclay
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Thomas Ricks, Superintendent, Captain Racette and others
ROBEL v. D'EMILIA et al
as 1:2012cv00716
Plaintiff:
DONNA ROBEL
Defendant:
JOHN D'EMILIA, AMANDA VALVANO, DEVIN FLAHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
