Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Roberts v. Hughston et al
as 7:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Harold Hughston, Jr. and Kyle Brown
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kyle Brown v. DePuy Mitek LLC et al
as 2:2012cv10297
Plaintiff:
Kyle Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Mitek LLC, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does and others
Bowie v. Hardee et al
as 5:2012ct03089
Plaintiff:
David A. Bowie
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Ricky Matthews, Christopher Auer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Brown et al
as 7:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Kyle Brown, Frank Brians, Timothy Howell and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Brown et al
as 7:2011cv03188
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Kyle Brown, Harold Hughston, Jr., Phillip Bowling and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locklear v. Hubbard et al
as 5:2011ct03094
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Locklear
Defendant:
Mr. Hubbard, Dean Locklear, Eric Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2010cv02026
Plaintiff:
THECLA BROWN and KYLE BROWN
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04097
Plaintiff:
THECLA BROWN and KYLE BROWN
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Preferred Trucking Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kyle Brown
Defendant:
Preferred Trucking Services, Inc. and Diane Schantz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
