Cases 31 - 40 of 88
MOORE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv16480
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY MOORE
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stacy Meaux v. Louisiana Office of Governor, et al
as 17-30916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACY MICHAEL MEAUX
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA OFFICE OF GOVERNOR, LOUISIANA OFFICE ATTORNEY GENERAL, MICHAEL COUVILLON and others
Moore v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2017cv02505
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Houston Police Department and Kevin Hubenak
Plaintiff:
Larry Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Larry Alston, Jr.
as 17-30559
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY MOORE ALSTON, JR., also known as Boosie
Stacy Meaux v. Louisiana Office of Governor, et al
as 17-30517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACY MICHAEL MEAUX
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA OFFICE OF GOVERNOR, LOUISIANA OFFICE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ABBEVILLE CITY COUNCIL and others
Meaux v. Governor et al
as 6:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Stacy Michael Meaux
Defendant:
LA Office of Governor, LA Office Attorney General, Couvillion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. USA
as 4:2016cv00136
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Larry Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00644
Petitioner:
LARRY MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mistrot et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2016cv02919
Plaintiff:
Cole Mistrot , Christopher Knight , John Norris and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
