Cases 31 - 40 of 389
Razulu v. Seamster et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shaka Rushdee Razulu
Defendant:
Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Tina M Evans, Brenda L Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Hyppolite et al
as 1:2023cv20208
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Evans and Jimmie M. Evans
Defendant:
Shyller Hyppolite, C. Lattibeaudiere, Miami-Dade County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Knight v. Edwards et al
as 2:2022cv05342
Plaintiff:
Raymond Knight
Defendant:
Daniel Edwards, Heath Martin, Robert Goings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Evans v. Amy Zubrensky
as 22-5199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph M. Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
Amy Helene Zubrensky
Kenan et al v. Kyriakides et al
as 8:2022cv01657
Plaintiff:
SANDRA C. KENAN and PERCY EL JACOBS
Defendant:
VERONICA KYRIAKIDES, EDWARD M. EVAN and Edward M. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
WHEELER v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
ZATECKY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayward Evans v. Delaware Department of Justice, et al
as 22-2115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYWARD M. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, SERGEANT D. W. COOKE, OFFICER W. M. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Evans v. Amy Zubrensky
as 22-5098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph M. Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
Amy Helene Zubrensky, Assistant U.S. Attorney
EVANS v. ZUBRENSKY
as 1:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. EVANS
Defendant:
AMY ZUBRENSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
