Cases 31 - 40 of 187
Douglas Hirano v. Kate McClory, et al
as 23-15620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE MCCLORY, SAND ISLAND TREATMENT CENTER, AT&T WIRELESS and others
Dora Morales-Rodas, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1646
Petitioner:
Dora Malia Morales-Rodas and A.J.M.M.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Grissom v. Roberts et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mark Grissom
Defendant:
Annah Roberts, Hayes Webb, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerow v. Newsom et al
as 8:2022cv02976
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, California State Senate, Toni Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Martin
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Malia McKenzie
Defendant:
Matthew Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. William Brothers Building and Construction et al
as 2:2022cv06428
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
William Brothers Building and Construction, Dvir David Oiaknin, Wendy Chachagua and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonsalves v. Withy et al
as 1:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Celeste M. Gonsalves
Defendant:
G. Todd Withy and Jean Malia Orque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hirano v. McClory et al
as 1:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hirano
Defendant:
Kate McClory, Sand Island Treatment Center, AT&T Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
