Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Boyd v. USA
as 1:2018cv00178
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Austin Boyd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adkins et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jesse M. Heaton, Teresa M. Weldon, Kara N. Lanham and others
Petitioner:
Theresa M. Donnelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Doe v. DeWees et al
as 8:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Unidentified contractor, Joyce Schaum and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyd v. Kelley
as 5:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael L Boyd
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03705
Plaintiff:
Michael D Boyd
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael Boyd
as 17-2084
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL NATHANIEL BOYD
BOYD v. USA
as 1:2017cv00589
Petitioner:
MICHAEL L. BOYD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
People of the State of Califor v. Michael Boyd
as 17-15871
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BOYD
Michael Boyd v. United States Department, et al
as 17-15641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, JACK LEW, Treasury Secretary, JERRY BROWN and others
CARE, et al v. CPUC, et al
as 17-55297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, a California Non-Profit Corporation, MICHAEL E. BOYD and ROBERT SARVEY
Plaintiff:
SOLUTIONS FOR UTILITIES, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, an Independent California State Agency, MICHAEL R. PEEVEY, TIMOTHY ALAN SIMON and others
Defendant:
RACHEL CHONG, JOHN A. BOHN, DIAN M. GRUENICH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
