Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Green v. Heath et al
as 3:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Green
Defendant:
Anthony Heath and Central MS Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10996
Plaintiff:
Ann L. Green and Mark S. Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Green, et al
as 15-5032
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant Crossclaimant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant Crossclaimant:
WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB
Defendant:
BROOKLYN M. GREEN
Defendant Cross Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ANDRES GREEN and JANA RAE GREEN
Defendant Cross Defendant:
D. SCOTT HEINEMAN, as Trustee of the Green Family Trust and KURT F. JOHNSON, as Trustee of the Green Family Trust
GREEN v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY GREEN
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JAMES W MILLS, BRAXTON T COTTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Marcus Green
as 15-50236
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS A. GREEN, also known as Mark Anthony Green, also known as Markus Anthony Green, also known as David Anthony Brenham, also known as Mark Anthony Butler, also known as Jacobb Williams, also known as Marcus Antonius, also known as Jeffrery Watson, als
Lopez v. Green et al
as 4:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Refugio Lopez
Defendant:
Mark nmn Green, Kasie Ellis and Regina Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Mark Green
as 14-51327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY GREEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Green v. CIR
as 14-9002
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK ANDRES GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
