Cases 31 - 40 of 943
Lee Evans v. Newark City, et al
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEE EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWARK, FORMER MAYOR COREY A. BOOKER, OFFICER JOE HADLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DETECTIVE SGT. WILLIAM TIETJEN
Lee Evans v. City of Newark, et al
as 23-1723
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEE EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWARK, FORMER MAYOR COREY A. BOOKER, OFFICER JOE HADLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LIEUTENANT LOU CARREGA
Defendant:
FORMER MAYOR CITY OF NEWARK, FORMER MAYOR DARNELL HENRY, FORMER MAYOR GARRY MCCARTHY and others
United States of America v. McAllister
as 23-6317
Defendant:
MICHAEL SKINNER, MICHAEL M. WRIGHT, P and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY MCALLISTER, Lex and L
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rabasca v. Siebel et al
as 4:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Rabasca
Defendant:
Thomas M. Siebel, Patricia A. House, Condoleezza Rice and others
Interested Party:
C3.ai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Gildehaus et al v. Reilly et al
as 5:2023cv05046
Plaintiff:
Roger Gildehaus and Sarah Gildehaus
Defendant:
Michael M. Reilly and Quantum Capital Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Goodwin v. Yamada
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Duchun Lafre Goodwin
Defendant:
Michael M. Yamada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Michael Brown
as 23-4135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL M. BROWN
Downey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Downey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Mulas Dairy Company et al
as 3:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
Mulas Dairy Company and Michael M. Mulas
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
