Cases 31 - 40 of 1,124
Archie Bear v. Dan Hartog, et al
as 23-3693
Plaintiff:
Archie Bear
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Terrance Griffin v. Ryshema Davis
as 23-7216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
RYSHEMA DAVIS, BETTY SMITH, BRIAN KENDALL and others
Butler v. Nance
as 2:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Rhett Butler
Defendant:
Steve Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Wayne Nance, Jr.
as 23-3306
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WAYNE R. NANCE, JR., also known as WAYNE R. EVANGELISTA
Clark v. Nance
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Nathan Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Galindo et al
as 1:2023cv16182
Plaintiff:
Ellean Nance
Defendant:
Lusecita Galindo, Warden C Truitt and David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evangelista, Wayne v. Crocker, Stephen et al
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Wayne Richard Evangelista and Wayne R. Nance, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen L. Crocker, Kim V. Gaffney, Kalvin D. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Anderson v. Cox et al
as 7:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Anderson
Defendant:
Mr. Cox, Mr. Hayes, Major Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
