Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Stipes v. Cooper et al
as 3:2026cv00189
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gauge Stipes
Defendant:
Curt Cooper, Kanesha Dotson, Rob Ratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
NANCE v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04467
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH NANCE
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NANCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv02233
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE KIONTAY NANCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Washington (Medina)
as 26-1647
Defendant:
DAVID WASHINGTON, TORRANCE BAILEY, DEVANTE NANCE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hall v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2026cv11971
Defendant:
Theresa Foss, Natalie Brookins, Karinah Riggins and others
Plaintiff:
Dequaun Lynn Hall
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wright v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2026cv00797
Plaintiff:
Danielle Wright
Defendant:
Dr. f/n/u Nguyen, f/n/u Nance, f/n/u Pigot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Wilshire Homes, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00155
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nance
Defendant:
Wilshire Homes, LLC and Craig Waldrop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hawkins v. Nance
as 8:2026cv01935
Petitioner:
Allan Lee Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden Jonathan Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.